427
edits
OB talk:Woodstock 2010: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
m (→Malcolm's preliminary proposal: corrected link for clarity) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Also can we please soon decide collectively on where howard should go and whether we're doing both 4:3 or only the indoor stage. This is also a presentation/production matter to some extent. | Also can we please soon decide collectively on where howard should go and whether we're doing both 4:3 or only the indoor stage. This is also a presentation/production matter to some extent. | ||
== Mike == | |||
aspect ratio fun: | |||
I think if the clever Nvidia graphics idea doesn't come up with anything by the end of your answeres rubbish (tuesday), we'll have to call it as all 4:3. (aww, I was looking forward to 16:9...). | |||
To give us a better chance next year at going widescreen, my suggestion is to also record widescreen 16:9 footage at the same time on the HD's and the Sky cam (like, a tape in each cam). Anyone brave enough can then edit up some 16:9 with sound from our digital copies and from VTA/VTB (whichever one ends up serving the mainstage), the sets from this year are then usable whatever happens next year... | |||
Sky cam location, your location seems good Malcolm, - i'd forgotten about the trees! , Can you slap that into the notes section? | |||
I'd say more now, but apparently I have some "jeff" acting to do for Manm Man at 10am... as long is it doesn't involve jam! | |||